Assessment and requirements. Applications will thereafter be used in Peer Review to be able to assess the content that is scientific of task and rank the proposals

Home / Uncategorized / Assessment and requirements. Applications will thereafter be used in Peer Review to be able to assess the content that is scientific of task and rank the proposals

Assessment and requirements. Applications will thereafter be used in Peer Review to be able to assess the content that is scientific of task and rank the proposals

Assessment and requirements. Applications will thereafter be used in Peer Review to be able to assess the content that is scientific of task and rank the proposals

Quicklinks

The Peer Review Panel

Access is awarded based on clinical quality for the proposals which is evaluated and assessed by a panel of worldwide specialists (Peer Review Panel – PRP), recognised with regards to their expertise in the area of conservation and scientific tests of Cultural Heritage.

The PRP is a board separate from the IPERION CH partners, and it’s also composed by:

A. G. Karydas – A. Heritage – A. Lluveras – A. Denker – A. Balzeau – C. Pacheco – E. Godfrey – G. Eggert – G. Verri – H.E. Mahnke – J. Dani – J. Raisanen – K.T. Biró – K. Van Balen Garden Grove escort – L. Robbiola – P. Noble – P. Ropret – S. Greiff – S. Zucchiatti

ARCHLAB – Evaluation process and requirements

Following the proposals are submitted, the ARCHLAB Program Coordinator and also the ARCHLAB greeting Desk, will confirm the compliance that is formal the EU laws, undertaking a prioritizing for the applications according to available expertise, ongoing possible collaboration jobs, available time etc. verifying as well the relevance/feasibility of usage of the ARCHLAB facility. Applications will thereafter be used in Peer Review so that you can measure the systematic content associated with the task and rank the proposals. The decision that is final be reported to your ARCHLAB Coordinator who can inform the applicant while the access provider of this Peer Review conclusions. Each access provider can certainly make a decision that is final the level of access supplied into the consumer Group (range times, amount of the visit, provider interior rules, IPR dilemmas, etc.). The choice is based mostly regarding the quality that is scientific the originality associated with medical proposition, along with the degree of expertise to put together and conduct the proposed research utilising the information available by the consumer Group together with web hosting provider. The applications should make an effort to boost the clinical production (qualitatively and quantitatively), optimize the usage regional expertise of ongoing research tasks and facilities, and foster lasting worldwide technology cooperation.

FIXLAB – Evaluation process and requirements

Following the proposals are submitted, the access provider worried along with FIXLAB greeting Desk will validate the formal conformity with the EU laws, undertaking a prioritizing associated with applications predicated on available expertise, ongoing prospective collaboration jobs, available time etc. also the necessity/feasibility for making use of the center. All applications will thereafter be utilized in Peer Review assessing the content that is scientific of task and ranking the proposals. The decision that is final be reported into the FIXLAB Welcome Desk that will inform the applicant while the access provider of this Peer Review conclusion. The access provider could make a final choice concerning the degree of access (instruments, times, period, IPR contract, etc.). The choice is therefore based mostly in the quality that is scientific the originality associated with clinical proposition, along with the amount of expertise to create and conduct the proposed experiment also to evaluate examples obtainable in an individual and host teams. The applications should try to boost the medical production (qualitatively and quantitatively), optimize the utilization of regional expertise of ongoing research tasks and facilities, and foster lasting science cooperation that is international.

MOLAB – Evaluation process and requirements

Following the proposals are submitted, the MOLAB Program Coordinator will confirm the compliance that is formal the EU laws, undertaking a prioritizing associated with the applications according to available expertise, ongoing prospective collaboration jobs, available time etc. verifying too the relevance/feasibility of usage of the MOLAB center. . The decision that is final be reported into the MOLAB Coordinator who can inform the applicant therefore the access provider of this Peer Review conclusions. Each access provider will likely make a final choice concerning the level of access supplied to your consumer Group (wide range of times, amount of the visit, provider interior guidelines, IPR issues, etc.). The choice is based mostly in the quality that is scientific the originality for the scientific proposal, plus the standard of expertise to put together and conduct the proposed research with the information available because of the consumer Group as well as the web hosting provider. The applications should make an effort to boost the scientific production (qualitatively and quantitatively), optimize the application of regional expertise of ongoing research tasks and facilities, and foster lasting science cooperation that is international.

Recent Posts

Leave a Comment